Gesellschaft für Organisation und Entscheidung m.b.H.Deutsch

Sustainability Rating of SRI-Funds

For sustainability and transparency in the fund market

The assessment for Sustainability Rating is done by GOE according to up-to-date methodology. The ratings are based on a comprehensive and systematic assessment. In a growing SRI-market GOE Sustainability Rating of funds provides guidance and transparency. The results of the Sustainability Rating are reported in fact sheets and a database. It is optimal for supporting investment decisions, for selecting appropriate SRI-funds for trading, for constructing SRI- fund of funds and for benchmarking a fund within its peer group

 

GOE Report No. 1-2005  Sustainability Rating. Analysis and Rating of Investment Funds

In this publication you find in depth and actual ratings of more than 40 SRI Funds available in German speaking countries. The publication contributes to the transparency in a fast growing business of green, socially responsible or sustainable financial products. In addition to a ranking of the SRI Funds you find extensive fact sheets presenting the strengths and weaknesses of the funds. That information supports you in the evaluation and selection of a SRI Fund of your choice. Furthermore the publication presents the method of the GOE-Sustainability Rating of SRI Funds. The development of the method was supported by the Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape and the Swiss Federal Office for Spatial Development.



Sustainability Rating. Analysis and Rating of Investment Funds
Köllner, T. and Weber, O. (2005)
GOE – Gesellschaft für Organisation und Entscheidung m.b.H.
Language: English
60 pages (printed report or electronic pdf)
Price: CHF 39.00

Method for our Sustainability Rating

Transparency was very important for us from the very beginning. The principles and the criteria (about 80) were presented and intensively discussed in two workshops with representatives from the investment sector (Bank Sarasin, Dexia, Global Care, SAM, UBS, ZKB), fund traders (Fondvest), environmental agencies (see above), universities (ETH Zurich) and SRI research providers (IMUG, Inrate, OnValues). Weights of criteria are based on opinion of workshop participants. The methodology behind Sustainability Rating is acknowledged internationally.

The sustainability rating of funds is based on multi criteria decision making. We assess the fund management and sustainability of investment portfolios. The rating of funds is based on three aspects:

Rating Criteria for Fund management & SRI-Research

The management of the fund and especially the SRI research are assessed with respect to following criteria:

Peer groups for comparison of fund results

Sustainability leader fundLarge companies with best sustainability practice in class, also best sector approach possible (>5 Billion € market cap)
Eco-pioneer fundInnovative small and mid cap companies focused on environmental technologies and services (small cap <1 Billion €; mid cap 1-5 Billion €)
Leader/pioneer fundMixture of sustainability leader and eco-pioneer com­panies or countries
Ethical fundCharacterized by lists of negative criteria for exclud­ing companies/ countries, also religious motivated
Style mix (ethical, leader, pioneer)Mixture of ethical investments with sustainability leader and/or pioneer approach (with strong empha­sis on ethical issues)
Environmental topic fundWater, Renewable energy, Sustainable forestry, Environmental technology for cleaner production
Eco-efficiency fundLarge companies with best environmental practice in class.

GOE Report No. 2-2005  Sustainability Rating. Comparative Analysis of Fund Portfolios

The goal of this study is to compare the environmental impacts of SRI-funds with those of conventional investment funds. The basic motivation for this study was the observation that the overlap of the portfolios of sustainability (SRI) funds and conventional equity funds can be very large. In addition the sector allocation of both types of funds is in general very similar, because portfolio manager follow the chosen benchmark to minimize risk. Both effects can result in no differentiation of both types of funds in terms of their environmental impact (null hypothesis). The goal of the study is to comparatively assess the environmental impact of portfolios of 26 investment funds. We selected 13 sustainability funds and 13 conventional funds for the benchmark MSCI World. The study applies the IO-LCA in combination with a simulation of company specific environmental performance for evaluating the environmental impact per functional unit for each fund, which is the risk adjusted financial performance. We then use statistical analysis to test the null hypothesis.



Sustainability Rating. Comparative Analysis of Fund Portfolios
Köllner, T., Weber, O. and Moser, C. (2005)
GOE – Gesellschaft für Organisation und Entscheidung m.b.H.

Care Group – Management Gesellschaft
Language: English
30 pages (electronic pdf)
Price: CHF 39.00

 

 


Both reports together are available for CHF 68.00

 

To order the publications, please send an e-mail with a request to info@goe.ch